Claude Bernard - Recognition And Later Work.

Claude Bernard's first important work was on the functions of the pancreas gland, the juice of which The earliest announcements of his results, the most striking of which were obtained in the ten years from about 1850 to 1860, were generally made in the recognized scientific publications; but the full...Did he recognize chemical reactions of enzymes? Did he separate fluids outside and inside the cell? Did he plant stomata opening and closing to maintain homeostasis? Did he recognize feedback loops?Claude Bernard was born on July 12, 1813, in the village of Saint-Julien, in France's Beaujolais region. Bernard is known for his discoveries concerning the On a broader stage, Bernard played a role in establishing the principles of experimentation in the life sciences, advancing beyond the vitalism and...Claude Bernard Medal and Lecture. This medal and lectureship is the EASD's highest award in recognition of an individual's innovative leadership The aim of the Lectureship, which is generously sponsored by Sanofi, is to recognise an individual's innovative leadership and outstanding...Université Claude Bernard Lyon 1 (UCBL) offers courses and programs leading to officially recognized higher education degrees such as bachelor degrees, master degrees, doctorate degrees in several areas of study. See the uniRank degree levels and areas of study matrix below for further details.

What did Claude Bernard first recognize? | Yahoo Answers

Menu. Claude Bernard. Mike Cadogan. Claude Bernard (1813 - 1878) was a French physician and physiologist. TEXT INFO.Claude Bernard's first important work was on the functions of the pancreas, the juice of which he proved to be of great significance in the process of But in the area of science that is still obscure and unknown the great are recognized: "They are marked by ideas which light up phenomena hitherto...Claude Bernard's first important works were carried out on the physiology of digestion, particularly the rôle of the pancreas exocrine gland, the gastric juices and of the intestines. The study of internal metabolism was also one of his main fields of interest, and he contributed to the understanding of...Explanation : Claude Bernand was a French Physiologist who first discovered about "homeostasis" which is defined as the controlled stability of the internal milieu, or internal environment, of cells and tissues in plants.

BRMI | History - Claude Bernard

L'Université Claude Bernard Lyon 1 forme chaque année 40.000 étudiants dans les sciences et technologies, la santé et le sport. Elle accompagne chacun d'entre eux dans la construction de son parcours personnel pour l'emmener vers un métier, son métier.Claude Bernard Produkte preiswert und schnell bestellen. Das traditionsreiche Schweizer Uhrenunternehmen Claude Bernard wurde 1973 in Les Genevez im schweizerischen Jura gegründet - ein kleines Dorf, das auf eine lange Uhrmacherkunst zurückblicken kann.Claude Bernard was a French physiologist, who first recognised plant stomata opening and closing to maintain homeostasis. Subject: Famous Personalities Exam Prep: AIEEE , Bank Exams Job Role: Analyst , Bank Clerk.Claude Bernard (French: [bɛʁnaʁ]; 12 July 1813 - 10 February 1878) was a French physiologist. Historian I. Bernard Cohen of Harvard University called Bernard "one of the greatest of all men of...Claude Bernard was the first person that we know of to recognize the underlying principles of homeostasis. In 1846, Claude Bernard first demonstrated a lipase activity in the pancreas. Then, in 1871 the existence of lipases in plant seeds was written about by Muntz MA.

Jump to navigation Jump to look For the Seventeenth-century Roman Catholic priest who popularized the Memorare, see Father Claude Bernard.

Claude BernardClaude BernardBorn12 July 1813Saint-JulienDied10 February 1878 (aged 64)ParisNationalityFrenchAlma materUniversity of ParisKnown forPhysiologyAwardsBaly Medal (1869)Copley Medal (1876)Scientific careerFieldsPhysiologyInstitutionsMuséum national d'Histoire naturelleInfluencesFrançois MagendieSignature

Claude Bernard (French: [bɛʁnaʁ]; 12 July 1813 – 10 February 1878) was a French physiologist. Historian I. Bernard Cohen of Harvard University called Bernard "one of the greatest of all men of science".[1] Among many different accomplishments, he used to be some of the first to indicate using a blinded experiment to ensure the objectivity of scientific observations.[2] He originated the time period milieu intérieur, and the related thought of homeostasis (the latter term being coined through Walter Cannon).

Life and occupation

Bernard used to be born in 1813 in the village of Saint-Julien[3] close to Villefranche-sur-Saône. He won his early schooling in the Jesuit school of that the town, after which proceeded to the school at Lyon, which, however, he soon left to turn out to be assistant in a druggist's store.[3] He is every so often described as an agnostic[4] and even humorously referred to by his colleagues as a "great priest of atheism". Despite this, after his demise Cardinal Ferdinand Donnet claimed Bernard was once a fervent Catholic,[5] with a biographical entry within the Catholic Encyclopedia.[6] His recreational hours were dedicated to the composition of a vaudeville comedy, and the success it achieved moved him to aim a prose drama in 5 acts, Arthur de Bretagne. [7]

In 1834, on the age of twenty-one, he went to Paris, armed with this play and an creation to Saint-Marc Girardin, however the critic dissuaded him from adopting literature as a occupation, and suggested him fairly to take up the find out about of medication.[3] This recommendation Bernard followed, and in due course he turned into interne on the Hôtel-Dieu de Paris. In this fashion he was once introduced into touch with the nice physiologist, François Magendie, who served as doctor on the hospital. Bernard turned into 'preparateur' (lab assistant) on the Collège de France in 1841.[7]

Memorial plaque in Paris marking the web page of Claude Bernard's laboratory from 1847 till his loss of life in 1878.

In 1845, Bernard married Marie Françoise "Fanny" Martin for convenience; the marriage was once arranged by means of a colleague and her dowry helped finance his experiments. In 1847 he used to be appointed Magendie's deputy-professor at the college, and in 1855 he succeeded him as full professor. In 1860, Bernard was once elected a world member of the American Philosophical Society.[8] His box of research was once considered inferior on the time, the laboratory assigned to him was simply a "common cellar."[9] Some time prior to now Bernard were chosen the first occupant of the newly instituted chair of physiology on the Sorbonne, but no laboratory used to be supplied for his use. It was Louis Napoleon who, after an interview with him in 1864, repaired the deficiency, development a laboratory at the Muséum national d'Histoire naturelle within the Jardin des Plantes. At the similar time, Napoleon III established a professorship which Bernard accepted, leaving the Sorbonne. [7] In the same yr, 1868, he was additionally admitted a member of the Académie française and elected a foreign member of the Royal Swedish Academy of Sciences.

When he died on 10 February 1878, he used to be accorded a public funeral – an honor which had by no means prior to been bestowed by way of France on a person of science.[7][3] He was once interred in Père Lachaise Cemetery in Paris.

Works

portrait via Marcel Mangin

Patron Claude Bernard's intention, as he said in his personal phrases, was to ascertain the use of the medical way in drugs. He disregarded many earlier misconceptions, took nothing without any consideration, and relied on experimentation. Unlike maximum of his contemporaries, he insisted that all dwelling creatures were sure by the similar rules as inanimate matter.

Claude Bernard's first important paintings used to be on the functions of the pancreas, the juice of which he proved to be of great importance in the means of digestion; this success gained him the prize for experimental physiology from the French Academy of Sciences.

A second investigation – perhaps his most famous – was at the glycogenic serve as of the liver;[10] at some point of his study he was once ended in the realization, which throws gentle at the causation of diabetes mellitus, that the liver, in addition to secreting bile, is the seat of an interior secretion, during which it prepares sugar on the expense of the weather of the blood passing via it.

A 3rd analysis resulted in the discovery of the vasomotor gadget. In 1851, whilst examining the effects produced within the temperature of more than a few portions of the body by means of segment of the nerve or nerves belonging to them, he spotted that department of the cervical sympathetic nerve gave upward thrust to more active circulate and extra forcible pulsation of the arteries in sure parts of the top, and a couple of months afterwards he seen that electrical excitation of the higher portion of the divided nerve had the opposite impact. In this manner he established the lifestyles of vasomotor nerves, both vasodilator and vasoconstrictor.[3]

The study of the physiological action of toxins used to be also of serious pastime to him, his consideration being faithful particularly to curare and carbon monoxide gasoline. Bernard is widely credited with first describing carbon monoxide's affinity for hemoglobin in 1857,[11] even supposing James Watt had drawn identical conclusions about hydrocarbonate's affinity for blood performing as "an antidote to the oxygen" in 1794 previous to the discoveries of carbon monoxide and hemoglobin.[12]

Milieu intérieur

Milieu intérieur is the important thing thought with which Bernard is associated. He wrote, "The stability of the internal environment [the milieu intérieur] is the condition for the free and independent life."[13] This is the underlying concept of what would later be called homeostasis, a time period coined by Walter Cannon. He additionally defined that:

The residing body, though it has need of the encircling atmosphere, is nonetheless quite independent of it. This independence which the organism has of its external environment, derives from the truth that in the dwelling being, the tissues are actually withdrawn from direct external influences and are secure by means of a veritable inner setting which is constituted, in particular, by the fluids circulating within the frame.

The constancy of the internal setting is the situation without cost and unbiased existence: the mechanism that makes it possible is that which assured the upkeep, inside the inner surroundings, of all the stipulations necessary for the lifetime of the elements.

The constancy of our surroundings presupposes a perfection of the organism such that external variations are at each speedy compensated and taken into steadiness. In consequence, a long way from being indifferent to the exterior international, the upper animal is on the contrary in an in depth and wise relation with it, so that its equilibrium results from a continuing and delicate compensation established as though the most delicate of balances.[14]

Vivisection

Bernard's clinical discoveries had been made via vivisection, of which he was once the principle proponent in Europe at the time. He wrote:

The physiologist is not any strange guy. He is a learned guy, a person possessed and absorbed via a scientific thought. He does now not pay attention the animals' cries of pain. He is unaware of the blood that flows. He sees not anything but his idea, and organisms which hide from him the secrets he is resolved to discover.[15]

Bernard practiced vivisection, to the disgust of his wife and daughters who had returned at house to find that he had vivisected their dog.[16] The couple was officially separated in 1869 and his spouse went on to actively campaign in opposition to the practice of vivisection.

His wife and daughters weren't the one ones disgusted by means of Bernard's animal experiments. The physician-scientist George Hoggan spent 4 months watching and working in Bernard's laboratory and used to be one of the vital few recent authors to chronicle what went on there. He used to be later moved to jot down that his stories in Bernard's lab had made him "prepared to see not only science, but even mankind, perish rather than have recourse to such means of saving it."

Introduction to the Study of Experimental Medicine

Claude Bernard and pupils

In his main discourse on the clinical approach, An Introduction to the Study of Experimental Medicine (1865[17]), Bernard described what makes a systematic principle just right and what makes a scientist essential, a true discoverer. Unlike many scientific writers of his time, Bernard wrote about his personal experiments and ideas, and used the first person.[18]

Known and Unknown. What makes a scientist essential, he states, is how well he or she has penetrated into the unknown. In spaces of science the place the facts are identified to everyone, all scientists are kind of equivalent—we can't know who is excellent. But within the house of science that is still obscure and unknown the good are recognized: "They are marked by ideas which light up phenomena hitherto obscure and carry science forward."[19]

Authority vs. Observation. It is through the experimental way that science is carried ahead—not through uncritically accepting the authority of educational or scholastic resources. In the experimental means, observable truth is our only authority. Bernard writes with clinical fervor:

When we meet a reality which contradicts a prevailing theory, we will have to settle for the truth and abandon the theory, even when the theory is supported by great names and usually approved.[20]

Induction and Deduction. Experimental science is a constant interchange between principle and fact, induction and deduction. Induction, reasoning from the precise to the general, and deduction, or reasoning from the general to the specific, are never in reality separate. A normal theory and our theoretical deductions from it should be tested with specific experiments designed to verify or deny their fact; whilst those specific experiments may lead us to formulate new theories.

Cause and Effect. The scientist tries to resolve the relation of reason and effect. This is correct for all sciences: the goal is to glue a "natural phenomenon" with its "immediate cause". We formulate hypotheses elucidating, as we see it, the relation of purpose and effect for particular phenomena. We check the hypotheses. And when an speculation is proved, this is a clinical theory. "Before that we have only groping and empiricism."[21]

Verification and Disproof. Bernard explains what makes a principle excellent or bad scientifically:

Theories are only hypotheses, verified by means of more or less numerous info. Those verified by way of essentially the most facts are the best, however even then they are by no means ultimate, by no means to be completely believed.[22] Claude Bernard

When have we verified that we have discovered a purpose? Bernard states:

Indeed, evidence that a given condition at all times precedes or accompanies a phenomenon does now not warrant concluding with simple task that a given situation is the rapid reason behind that phenomenon. It should still be established that after this situation is got rid of, the phenomenon will not seem…[23]

We must all the time attempt to disprove our own theories. "We can solidly settle our ideas only by trying to destroy our own conclusions by counter-experiments."[24] What is observably true is the one authority. If thru experiment, you contradict your individual conclusions—you will have to accept the contradiction—however only on one condition: that the contradiction is PROVED.

Determinism and Averages. In the study of disease, "the real and effective cause of a disease must be constant and determined, that is, unique; anything else would be a denial of science in medicine." In reality, a "very frequent application of mathematics to biology [is] the use of averages"—this is, statistics—which may give only "apparent accuracy". Sometimes averages do not give the kind of knowledge needed to save lives. For instance:

A great surgeon plays operations for stone by a single manner; later he makes a statistical abstract of deaths and recoveries, and he concludes from these statistics that the mortality legislation for this operation is 2 out of five. Well, I say that this ratio manner actually not anything scientifically and gives us no simple task in acting the following operation; for we do not know whether or not the next case can be a few of the recoveries or the deaths. What in point of fact must be finished, as a substitute of amassing info empirically, is to review them extra accurately, each and every in its special determinism….to discover in them the cause of mortal injuries with the intention to grasp the reason and avoid the accidents.[25]

Although the application of mathematics to each and every facet of science is its ultimate objective, biology is still too complex and poorly understood. Therefore, for now the goal of scientific science must be to discover all the new details possible. Qualitative research must at all times precede quantitative analysis.

Truth vs. Falsification. The "philosophic spirit", writes Bernard, is at all times energetic in its need for fact. It stimulates a "kind of thirst for the unknown" which ennobles and enlivens science—where, as experimenters, we'd like "only to stand face to face with nature".[26] The minds which are great "are never self-satisfied, but still continue to strive."[27] Among the nice minds he names Joseph Priestley and Blaise Pascal.

Meanwhile, there are the ones whose "minds are bound and cramped".[28] They oppose finding the unknown (which "is generally an unforeseen relation not included in theory") as a result of they do not want to uncover anything that may disprove their own theories. Bernard calls them "despisers of their fellows" and says "the dominant idea of these despisers of their fellows is to find others' theories faulty and try to contradict them."[29] They are misleading, for of their experiments they record best results that make their theories seem proper and suppress results that enhance their opponents. In this way, they "falsify science and the facts":

They make poor observations, as a result of they make a choice a number of the results in their experiments only what suits their object, neglecting whatever is unrelated to it and in moderation environment aside the entirety which may generally tend towards the theory they want to fight.[29]

Discovering vs. Despising. The "despisers of their fellows" lack the "ardent desire for knowledge" that the real clinical spirit will always have—and so the development of science will never be stopped by way of them. Bernard writes:

Ardent need for knowledge, in fact, is the one purpose attracting and supporting investigators of their efforts; and just this data, in reality grasped and yet all the time flying before them, becomes directly their sole torment and their sole happiness….A man of science rises ever, in in the hunt for reality; and if he by no means unearths it in its wholeness, he discovers however very significant fragments; and those fragments of universal reality are precisely what constitutes science.[30]

References

^ Cohen, I. Bernard, "Foreword", within the Dover edition (1957) of: Bernard, Claude, An Introduction to the Study of Experimental Medicine (originally published in 1865; first English translation through Henry Copley Greene, printed by Macmillan & Co., Ltd., 1927). ^ .mw-parser-output cite.citationfont-style:inherit.mw-parser-output .citation qquotes:"\"""\"""'""'".mw-parser-output .id-lock-free a,.mw-parser-output .quotation .cs1-lock-free abackground:linear-gradient(clear,clear),url("//upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/6/65/Lock-green.svg")appropriate 0.1em center/9px no-repeat.mw-parser-output .id-lock-limited a,.mw-parser-output .id-lock-registration a,.mw-parser-output .citation .cs1-lock-limited a,.mw-parser-output .quotation .cs1-lock-registration abackground:linear-gradient(clear,clear),url("//upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/d/d6/Lock-gray-alt-2.svg")correct 0.1em center/9px no-repeat.mw-parser-output .id-lock-subscription a,.mw-parser-output .quotation .cs1-lock-subscription abackground:linear-gradient(clear,transparent),url("//upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/a/aa/Lock-red-alt-2.svg")appropriate 0.1em center/9px no-repeat.mw-parser-output .cs1-subscription,.mw-parser-output .cs1-registrationcolor:#555.mw-parser-output .cs1-subscription span,.mw-parser-output .cs1-registration spanborder-bottom:1px dotted;cursor:help.mw-parser-output .cs1-ws-icon abackground:linear-gradient(transparent,clear),url("//upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/4/4c/Wikisource-logo.svg")correct 0.1em heart/12px no-repeat.mw-parser-output code.cs1-codecolour:inherit;background:inherit;border:none;padding:inherit.mw-parser-output .cs1-hidden-errordisplay:none;font-size:100%.mw-parser-output .cs1-visible-errorfont-size:100%.mw-parser-output .cs1-maintshow:none;color:#33aa33;margin-left:0.3em.mw-parser-output .cs1-formatfont-size:95%.mw-parser-output .cs1-kern-left,.mw-parser-output .cs1-kern-wl-leftpadding-left:0.2em.mw-parser-output .cs1-kern-right,.mw-parser-output .cs1-kern-wl-rightpadding-right:0.2em.mw-parser-output .quotation .mw-selflinkfont-weight:inheritDaston, Lorraine. "Scientific Error and the Ethos of Belief". Social Research. 72 (Spring 2005): 18. ^ a b c d e D. Wright Wilson (June 1914). "Claude Bernard". Popular Science. Bonnier Corporation: 567–578. ^ John G. Simmons (2002). Doctors and Discoveries: Lives That Created Today's Medicine. Houghton Mifflin Harcourt. p. 17. ISBN 978-0-618-15276-6. Upon his death on February 10, 1878, Bernard won a state funeral – the first French scientist to be so venerated. The procession ended at Pere Lachaise cemetery, and Gustave Flaubert described it later with a slightly of irony as 'non secular and very beautiful'. Bernard was an agnostic. ^ Donnet, Vincent (1998). "[Was Claude Bernard an atheist?]" (PDF). Histoire des Sciences Médicales. 32 (1): 51–55. ISSN 0440-8888. PMID 11625277. ^ http://www.newadvent.org/cathen/02497a.htm ^ a b c d Chisholm 1911. ^ "APS Member History". search.amphilsoc.org. Retrieved 15 January 2021. ^ Vallery-Radot, René (1 March 2003). Life of Pasteur 1928. p. 42. ISBN 9780766143524. ^ F. G. Young (1957). "Claude Bernard and the Discovery of Glycogen". British Medical Journal. 1 (5033 (Jun. 22, 1957)): 1431–7. doi:10.1136/bmj.1.5033.1431. JSTOR 25382898. PMC 1973429. PMID 13436813. ^ Otterbein, Leo E. (April 2002). "Carbon Monoxide: Innovative Anti-inflammatory Properties of an Age-Old Gas Molecule". Antioxidants & Redox Signaling. 4 (2): 309–319. doi:10.1089/152308602753666361. ISSN 1523-0864. ^ Beddoes, Thomas; Watt, James (1794). Considerations at the Medicinal Use of Factitious Airs: And at the Manner of Obtaining Them in Large Quantities. In Two Parts. Part I. by means of Thomas Beddoes, M.D. Part II. by way of James Watt, Esq. Google Books (loose): Bulgin and Rosser. ^ Bernard, C. (1974) Lectures on the phenomena common to animals and vegetation. Trans Hoff HE, Guillemin R, Guillemin L, Springfield (IL): Charles C Thomas ISBN 978-0-398-02857-2. ^ Bernard, Claude (1974). Lectures on the Phenomena of Life Common to Animals and Plants. Hebbel E. Hoff, Roger Guillemin, Lucienne Guillemin (trans.). Springfield, Illinois. USA: Charles C Thomas. p. 84. ISBN 0-398-02857-5. ^ Preece, Rod (2002). Awe for the Tiger, Love for the Lamb: A Chronicle of Sensibility to Animals. p. 309. ISBN 9780774808972. ^ Mary Midgley (1998). Animals and Why They Matter. University of Georgia Press. p. 28. ISBN 9780820320410. ^ Bernard, Claude (1865). Introduction à l'étude de la médecine expérimentale. Paris. ^ Bernard, Claude, An Introduction to the Study of Experimental Medicine (Dover version 1957; at first printed in 1865; first English translation by Henry Copley Greene, printed by Macmillan & Co., Ltd., 1927). ^ Bernard (1957), p. 42. ^ Bernard (1957), p. 164. ^ Bernard (1957), p. 74. ^ Bernard (1957), p. 165. ^ Bernard (1957), p. 55. ^ Bernard (1957), p. 56. ^ Bernard (1957), p. 137. ^ Bernard (1957), p. 221. ^ Bernard (1957), p. 222. ^ Bernard (1957), p. 37. ^ a b Bernard (1957), p. 38. ^ Bernard (1957), p. 22. Attribution

This article comprises textual content from a newsletter now in the public area: Chisholm, Hugh, ed. (1911). "Bernard, Claude". Encyclopædia Britannica. 3 (eleventh ed.). Cambridge University Press.

External hyperlinks

Wikimedia Commons has media associated with Claude Bernard. Wikiquote has quotations associated with: Claude Bernard Wikisource has original works written by way of or about:Claude BernardWorks by Claude Bernard at Project Gutenberg Works through Claude Bernard at Faded Page (Canada) Works by or about Claude Bernard at Internet Archive Biography, bibliography, and links on digitized assets in the Virtual Laboratory of the Max Planck Institute for the History of Science 'Claude Bernard': detailed biography and a comprehensive bibliography linked to finish online texts, quotations, pictures and extra. (in French) Biography and genealogy of Claude Bernard. The Claude Bernard Museum (in French) Claude Bernard's works digitized via the BIUM (Bibliothèque interuniversitaire de médecine et d'odontologie, Paris), see its virtual library Medic@.vteSubfields of and cyberneticians focused on cyberneticsSubfields Artificial intelligence Biological cybernetics Biomedical cybernetics Biorobotics Biosemiotics Neurocybernetics Catastrophe principle Computational neuroscience Connectionism Control principle Cybernetics within the Soviet Union Decision principle Emergence Engineering cybernetics Homeostasis Information theory Management cybernetics Medical cybernetics Second-order cybernetics Semiotics Sociocybernetics Polycontexturality SynergeticsCyberneticians Alexander Lerner Alexey Lyapunov Alfred Radcliffe-Brown Allenna Leonard Anthony Wilden Buckminster Fuller Charles François Claude Bernard Cliff Joslyn Erich von Holst Ernst von Glasersfeld Francis Heylighen Francisco Varela Frederic Vester Charles Geoffrey Vickers Gordon Pask Gordon S. Brown Gregory Bateson Heinz von Foerster Humberto Maturana I. A. Richards Igor Aleksander Jacque Fresco Jakob von Uexküll Jason Jixuan Hu Jay Wright Forrester Jennifer Wilby John N. Warfield Kevin Warwick Ludwig von Bertalanffy Maleyka Abbaszadeh Manfred Clynes Margaret Mead Marian Mazur N. Katherine Hayles Natalia Bekhtereva Niklas Luhmann Norbert Wiener Pyotr Grigorenko Qian Xuesen Ranulph Glanville Robert Trappl Sergei P. Kurdyumov Anthony Stafford Beer Stuart Kauffman Stuart Umpleby Talcott Parsons Ulla Mitzdorf Valentin Turchin Valentin Braitenberg William Ross Ashby Walter Bradford Cannon Walter Pitts Warren McCulloch William Grey Walter vteAcadémie française seat 29 Pierre Bardin (1634) Nicholas Bourbon (1637) François-Henri Salomon de Virelade (1644) Philippe Quinault (1670) François de Callières (1688) André-Hercule de Fleury (1717) Paul d'Albert de Luynes (1743) Jean-Pierre Claris de Florian (1788) Jean-François Cailhava (1803) Joseph François Michaud (1813) Jean Pierre Flourens (1840) Claude Bernard (1868) Ernest Renan (1878) Paul-Armand Challemel-Lacour (1893) Gabriel Hanotaux (1897) André Siegfried (1944) Henry de Montherlant (1960) Claude Lévi-Strauss (1973) Amin Maalouf (2011) vteCopley Medallists (1851–1900) Richard Owen (1851) Alexander von Humboldt (1852) Heinrich Wilhelm Dove (1853) Johannes Peter Müller (1854) Léon Foucault (1855) Henri Milne-Edwards (1856) Michel Eugène Chevreul (1857) Charles Lyell (1858) Wilhelm Eduard Weber (1859) Robert Bunsen (1860) Louis Agassiz (1861) Thomas Graham (1862) Adam Sedgwick (1863) Charles Darwin (1864) Michel Chasles (1865) Julius Plücker (1866) Karl Ernst von Baer (1867) Charles Wheatstone (1868) Henri Victor Regnault (1869) James Prescott Joule (1870) Julius Robert von Mayer (1871) Friedrich Wöhler (1872) Hermann von Helmholtz (1873) Louis Pasteur (1874) August Wilhelm von Hofmann (1875) Claude Bernard (1876) James Dwight Dana (1877) Jean-Baptiste Boussingault (1878) Rudolf Clausius (1879) James Joseph Sylvester (1880) Charles Adolphe Wurtz (1881) Arthur Cayley (1882) William Thomson (1883) Carl Ludwig (1884) Friedrich August Kekulé von Stradonitz (1885) Franz Ernst Neumann (1886) Joseph Dalton Hooker (1887) Thomas Henry Huxley (1888) George Salmon (1889) Simon Newcomb (1890) Stanislao Cannizzaro (1891) Rudolf Virchow (1892) George Gabriel Stokes (1893) Edward Frankland (1894) Karl Weierstrass (1895) Karl Gegenbaur (1896) Albert von Kölliker (1897) William Huggins (1898) John William Strutt (1899) Marcellin Berthelot (1900) Authority control BIBSYS: 90299653 BNE: XX983777 BNF: cb11891495d (data) CANTIC: a11231713 CiNii: DA00833582 GND: 118656244 ISNI: 0000 0001 2139 297X LCCN: n79117116 LNB: 000011829 Léonore: LH/194/69 NDL: 00433087 NKC: nlk20000079574 NLA: 35017887 NLG: 160021 NLI: 000262504 NLK: KAC201769046 NLP: A20348320 NSK: 000128922 NTA: 069230005 PLWABN: 9810636962805606 RERO: 02-A013632509 SELIBR: 178037 SNAC: w6p55zjd SUDOC: 026721902 Trove: 792402 VcBA: 495/91339 VIAF: 73849966 WorldCat Identities: lccn-n79117116 Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Claude_Bernard&oldid=1014840211"